Tupac sighting at Forever 21


Tomorrow I’m off to the Edel Gathering!  It’s a meetup/conference for Catholic women in Austin, Texas, and my introverted self has been slightly nervous because I’m going solo, without any bff’s–which ultimately means I might be awkwardly lurking around all weekend.  But when your friend Jen Fulwiler texts you and invites you to help out at the cool event she and Hallie Lord are putting together, you say yes.  Because Jen Fulwiler.  And Hallie Lord.

FYI I’m leaving for the airport before dawn and I still have virtually nothing packed, a huge mountain of laundry to wash, a Target run yet to make, and I’m pretty sure I’m going to be getting my eyebrows done at 6 am (Mom, you’re willing to do my eyebrows at 6 am, right????!!!!) since I wasn’t able to squeeze that in today.  BECAUSE I WAS TOO BUSY SHOPPING AT FOREVER 21 WITH EIGHT KIDS .

True story.

My apologies to any shoppers who had their toes nearly cut off by my sons pushing the two errant and wayward strollers that don’t turn or roll properly.  My apologies to the employee about whom one of my children noisily asked “IS THAT A BOY OR A GIRL?” and about whom I had to honestly answer ”I DON’T KNOW.”  And, I finally must also apologize to the sales clerk who attempted to inform me that I was not in the right place for the line, and who I brusquely informed that I’d been waiting five minutes already and had gotten in line behind someone (thus believing it to be the line) and I wasn’t going to wait for the other new people who magically knew where the line was supposed to be but had not been waiting as long as me, because my baby was screaming and my seven year old had developed a migraine and I NEEDED TO GET OUT OF THIS STORE.

I am, apparently, not forever 21.  In part because I do not prefer dresses that don’t fully cover my backside or upper thighs–sorry dressing room mirror for subjecting you to the horror that was every single dress I tried on.  I will be sure to visit a tanning booth, gym, and time machine before I stop in again.

It wasn’t ALL bad, though.  The best part about my kid-o-licious afternoon shopping spree was, by far, the Tupac shirt.  Which, if you’ve read Jen’s book Something Other Than God, you know is particularly meaningful.  OH how I wanted to buy and proudly wear that shirt to Edel, but it would have shown my entire midriff and, well, that would have been super awkward.  And frankly, nothing to be proud of.  So I took a picture instead to the sound of my kids asking “Why are you photographing that shirt with the man’s face all over it?”, and me saying “It’s a famous rapper” while humming “Changes” in my head.  The penitentiary’s PACKED…

Anyhow, I have to put down the laptop and go get some things done because hello, I’m leaving in the morning and I just remembered my fingernails are all blue and chippy.

Looking forward to seeing you in Austin!

The myth about siblings

siblingsfieldHello, my name is Brianna.

I have eight kids.

Which means each and every one of my children has seven siblings.

And someday they might have more because we’re some of those crazy people that remain open to children.  There’s no real reason for us not to be, and have you noticed how cute newborn babies are?  Also, my kids started begging for another baby by the time Alice was six months old.  So there’s that.

I’m an only child so I can’t know for sure, but I would assume that growing up in a large family probably has its challenges.  Then again, I think that’s every family.  The challenges might look different but they’ll still be there, whether you have two kids or ten.  So I figure you may as well keep having cute babies, amIright?

There is, understandably, a lot of fear when it comes to large families.  It’s something many couples assume they can’t do.  It’s something many couples assume only super-human or gluttons-for-punishment types do do.  Can I give my kids enough love, how will we pay for college, what is the mommy-sanity tipping point?  And, is it intrinsically unfair to a child to raise him or her with lots of siblings?

I’ll be honest and say that over ten years into this parenting thing, I’m pretty much convinced–convinced, I tell you!–that that last one is the silliest objection of them all.  Really.  My kids occasionally argue or hurt each other’s feelings, but most of the time?  They get along.  They’re buddies.  They miss one another if someone is gone, ride bikes on the driveway for hours and hours, and whisper long after they’ve been tucked into bed for the night.  They pray before a little sister with Down syndrome goes in for surgery and cheer for an older brother when he finally manages to swim across the entire pool.

There is something to be said for the whole shared experiences/rooms/family culture thing.  In spite of there being so many kids and only two parents it just works, because we’re a FAMILY.

What I guess I find fascinating though is the common assumption that having multiple children means more fighting and arguing and disharmony, and a lower quality of life for all–as if home life were a pie chart, with a limited number of available resources, where each child competes for his or her share.  Child psychiatrist David Levy popularized the term “sibling rivalry” in the 1930s, and had this to say in reference to older siblings:  “the aggressive response to the new baby is so typical that it is safe to say it is a common feature of family life.” 

And I think, really?  Is that really true?  This has never been our experience.  Not even once.  Not when a new baby has been born to us, and not when a new child has joined our family through adoption.  What can only be described as a thoroughly evolutionary worldview leaves little room for love or humanity or, ultimately, for God.  Who created the family and love between spouses, from whence children come.

But people believe it.  To the point where this idea has been quietly assimilated into the culture and become part of our modern parenting lexicon.   And I’m not saying that a toddler won’t occasionally envy the baby sitting in mom’s lap or that a ten-year-old child won’t complain about not having his or her own room every once in awhile.  That’s normal.  Because kids are impatient, and because kids complain.  But that does NOT mean that they are better off without each other.  Or that we should be forced into thinking that to have siblings is to be at a disadvantage or in a position to receive less of the love necessary to a good childhood.  Because that’s just plain WRONG.  Inaccurate.  Upside-down.

Frankly, I suspect some of this is the result of self-fulfilling prophecy: if we are unequivocally excited about a new baby on the way, and speak in terms that reflect how this little life is a gift to our entire family, our other children will see that excitement and at some point begin to manifest it themselves.  But if we tiptoe around it, go out of our way to focus on how “you won’t be replaced!” and “are you okay about having another baby join our family?” and “I’m so sorry you’ll have to make lots and lots of sacrifices”, our kids might actually start suspecting there’s a reason to feel threatened.  And that siblings pose a direct challenge to their personal well-being, which admittedly sounds pretty scary.  See how that works?

It’s the great big secular lie that tells us that family life is like the aforementioned pie-chart, with a finite number of resources–love, food, attention, material goods–and that the more people there are sharing that pie, the less each individual family member gets.  When seen this way, a large family becomes a scandal.  Because all of a sudden, what ought to be seen as a generous “yes” to life becomes an intrinsically selfish act, where everybody gets a smaller piece of that darned pie.  And an institution created to foster love and peace and formation becomes a breeding ground (pun intended) for resentment and competition.

It’s not exaggerating to say that the pie-chart model remains a grossly impoverished lens through which to view the mystery of marriage and ultimately of love.  God designed babies to bond family members together, not drive us apart.  What we may “lose” in our ability to regularly eat out at nice restaurants or drive a fancy compact car we gain in the joy and delight of another little soul at our dining room table.  We experience in a unique way the reality that life is filled with ups and downs and small victories and slow progress.  Our hearts are strengthened when we witness the human capacity for love, in action, a love that can somehow keep growing to include new babies in the womb and new brothers and sisters from another continent.  We see children growing in confidence, and who are supremely comfortable with their place in the world because they are literally surrounded by love.

And we should probably be skeptical of something that everyone takes for granted now, even though it wasn’t really on anyone’s radar seventy years ago.

Of course all of this is pretty much in the abstract, and if I could I’d invite you into my home so you could see the excited crowd that gathers around Alice anytime she does something new.  So you’ll just have to take my word for it that my kids are happy, they enjoy having brothers and sisters to play with, and new babies do not necessarily trigger an aggressive response in older siblings.  The family was designed by God to be a place of love, and really–who doesn’t love a baby?

Hobby Lobby vs. women

SCOTUS2-blog480Has anyone else been thinking less about yesterday’s SCOTUS ruling, and more about the general reaction to yesterday’s SCOTUS ruling?  While I (as a Catholic with a lot of Christian friends) know plenty of people happy about the outcome, I also know folks who are FURIOUS.  Like F-bomb dropping, name-calling FURIOUS.  How dare a bunch of conservative old guys decide that an employer doesn’t have to pay for our morning-after pill?  And, why are women’s rights being trampled in a time of supposed equality and modernity?  These are the questions they’re asking.  Minus the profanity, because I like to keep it G-rated around here.

Now I don’t personally use artificial contraception of any sort, and while I used to take the pill, I’ve (thankfully!) been off it for over ten years–so clearly I’m not disappointed in how the whole Hobby Lobby thing turned out.  I am, on the contrary, glad that religious freedom ruled the day.  To those who disagree, well, for people like me–who believe that life begins at conception–something like the morning-after pill is a Really Big Deal.  And employers shouldn’t have to cover it, because it has the potential to take the life of another human being.  It’s what’s called an abortifacient, and it’s (part of) why any sort of hormonal birth control (IUD, pills, shots) is wrought with ethical and moral problems.  It’s why I ultimately stopped taking the pill, all those years ago.

And you know?  That was really scary.  I’ll go right ahead and admit it, right in front of all my pious Catholic readers.  It was scary to throw out my birth control.  And not because I was somehow in a bad position to have children (I was married and my husband had a good job) or because I didn’t want to be a mother (I looked forward to growing our family).  No, it was scary because it meant giving up control.  It was scary because it meant losing my freedom.  It was scary because I believed that women need birth control to be happy.

So even though I don’t believe that anymore, and now believe quite the opposite–that artificial contraception is incredibly HARMFUL to women–I can understand why so many women do consider hormonal birth control vital to a liberated womanhood.  Because I’ve been there.  And I also understand why, as a result, so many women are offended by the SCOTUS decision.  It sounds restricting, limiting, and bound up in some really personal things like the female body and female sexual expression.  And here these out-of-touch old men said NO, corporations don’t have to pay for your pills.  And women and men alike are mad, not because they’re no longer able to access the drugs, but because somebody (technically five somebodies) indirectly passed moral judgment on something they either use or may want to use.  And that’s intrinsically offensive.

If nothing else, I suppose the ruling has everyone talking about the moral and communal implications of birth control.  I’m reading Margaret Sanger’s The Pivot of Civilization right now, and needless to say it’s fascinating!  The birth control movement she founded once upon a time was actually rooted in a disturbing manifestation of Darwinism, and built upon the horrific foundation of the eugenics movement–as opposed to the more modern (and seemingly harmless) view that women should have the ability to enjoy unrestricted sex without any consequences.

No doubt a secular product of her time, Margaret viewed sexuality as an irrepressible instinct, believed that the poor, infirm, imprisoned, and “mentally defective” ought not be breeding (and therefore destroying the human race), and so believed that sterilization and contraception were integral to solving the world’s problems.  (Back in 1922, when the book was published, Margaret identified some of these problems as poverty, world hunger, the public school system, moral decay, and the financial drain of the mentally and physically disabled on society.)  She more or less envisioned a future where only educated and upright families of means were reproducing, and even received glowing endorsements from Martin Luther King, Jr. for her work in urban African American neighborhoods.

File that one away under “things that make you go, hmmmm.”

Sanger was, ultimately, an activist for social reformAnd many of the problems she describes are at least mildly related to sex.  But her solutions are all based upon the false (and terribly destructive) premises that a) one does not possess inherent dignity solely on account of being a person, and b) that it’s virtually impossible to not have sex.

It is a horrible lie that you have to be wealthy, brilliant, or in possession of all of your limbs or mental faculties to have value as a human being.  Margaret Sanger’s vision for the future however was fueled by this idea that a flourishing society is one in which there are no weak members.  She writes about how charitable giving and aid are intrinsically bad for a society because they sentimentalize poverty and need, and apparently make it harder to weed those people out and secure a civilization’s happy future.  The historical Christian worldview, however, tells us to care for the vulnerable, sick, hurting, and broken.  It tells us that a person matters NOT for what he or she gives to society, but because he or she was created by God, body and soul.  With dignity.

And as to Sanger’s idea that we operate only off of instinct and therefore have no choice but to engage in indiscriminate sex, well, if we were but mere animals I suppose that would be true.  Except we’re not.  We’re people. With free will and the ability to make choices and exercise self-control.  Not that we always do nor are we all necessarily equally culpable for those choices, which are not made in a vacuum but shaped through family upbringing and religious background and past traumas and experiences.  But we CAN.  Therefore a poor, single, uneducated woman laboring in a workhouse, with five small children at home, does not have to be sterilized to avoid further pregnancy.  She can choose to be abstinent.  She can choose to practice NFP.  She can choose to have sex and become pregnant.  No matter what, there is some sort of choice.

The thing I keep coming back to as I read Sanger’s cold and calculated words (and desire to see much of the population wiped off the map), with the sounds of my many happy kids splashing in the pool in the background (you don’t read Margaret Sanger at the pool?), is that so very many of the world’s problems boil down to the oppression of women and, more specifically, the oppression of women at the hands of men.  We see it over and over again, this burden that women carry, particularly when it comes to procreation.  Margaret Sanger actually isn’t wrong to point out that many problems do find their origin in sexual expression and the unequal footing of women in this regard.

And I suspect this is why so many women have bristled at the recent Supreme Court decision.  Women feel like they’re being told what they can’t do or have by men, and that it somehow condemns us to a life of bearing the consequences of men, and so we’re angry.  We want freedom.  And equality.  And the ability to choose for ourselves.

But the thing is, we HAVE a choice!  We really, truly do.  That was of course what I didn’t quite understand when I first heard that hormonal birth control was not in keeping with the pro-life worldview I held, and so I recoiled in disgust because THAT CAN’T BE TRUE! and WELL WHAT DO THESE ANTI-HORMONAL-BIRTH-CONTROL CHRISTIANS THINK WOMEN ARE SUPPOSED TO DO?!

I didn’t yet see how God created procreation to go right along with sexual expression, or how children are actually the tangible result and sign of married love and commitment.  However once I began to accept the reality of these incredible mysteries–and it was an incremental process to be sure–I saw that it actually all makes perfect sense.  And we women do have a choice, because a choice to participate in the act that brings forth children is the conscious assent to potential motherhood that Margaret Sanger writes about.  Karol Wojtyla describes it in Love and Responsibility as “I may become a mother” or “I may become a father.”  Choice.  Freedom.  To co-create a human person, with God.

It’s sad that the founder of what is now called Planned Parenthood (a name Sanger herself resisted because she felt it “too euphemistic”) so clearly saw what she referred to as ”the power of procreation”, yet failed to grasp its intrinsic connection to sexuality.  It is also curious that Margaret Sanger was personally anti-abortion–oh yes, she was–and I wonder how she might respond to the knowledge that today’s hormonal contraception bears an abortifacient effect.  Obviously we’ll never know, but what I do know is that these justices who yesterday upheld the concept of religious freedom, and Hobby Lobby’s right to refuse payment for the morning-after pill?  They are not the problem.  They are not the oppressors.  They are not the ones hurting women or destroying freedoms.

The secular, utilitarian culture; the thoughtless men who use women for supposed sex without the babies; trusted Christian leaders who promote hormonal birth control as safe and effective when it is, in reality, neither: THESE ARE THE PROBLEM.

My hope is that women will continue to rethink their options and have the courage to choose dignity and life–for themselves, their relationships, their children, and their communities.  In the meantime I, as a woman who believes strongly in women’s rights and freedoms, applaud Hobby Lobby’s tenacity and commitment to positive values.  May it embolden other individuals and corporations to stand by their own moral convictions, especially those convictions that are undeniably good for women.


Pill_MainDid you know that on this day in 1960, the FDA approved the first oral contraceptive?

That’s fifty-four years ago!  So, kind of a long time.

Most of you probably know about how I used to take the birth control pill, but eventually stopped–because it made me sick and because it made my uterus an inhospitable place for a fertilized egg (aka human person) to implant and grow.  Ew.

Ever since I dumped my prescription in the trash, I’ve admittedly been fascinated by its complicated history and overall effect on society.  I’m convinced that the advent of hormonal birth control has shifted sexual norms and attitudes as much as–if not more–than anything else, and that we are just now beginning to see some of the consequences.  I’m sure some people think those consequences are overwhelmingly good, but I’m not one of those people.

No, I believe the divorce of sex from procreation has harmed women.  I believe the expectation that women will be available for purely recreational and uncommitted sex is a problem.  I believe that ingesting synthetic hormones carries major risks that are just not worth taking.

I believe that sex without the babies is a MYTH.

It’s interesting because when you read about the early feminist and birth control movements in the United States, you can see how the goals of those movements were undeniably pro-woman.  Equality, health, a conscious openness to motherhood, the potential for a good quality of life, all of those things are noble and very right aims.  The sad thing is though that none of them are best accomplished through the distribution of hormonal birth control!

Gender equality is not achieved through allowing yourself to be used by men.  Swallowing a carcinogen every single day is not healthy.  Engaging in sex itself is, by its very nature, a physical expression of an openness to motherhood.

Even though I know full-well that I’m in the minority of people who think hormonal birth control is a real problem, the whole national conversation about women’s reproductive rights doesn’t intimidate or scare me.  We SHOULD be talking about what’s good for women.  And it’s not enough to say “my church prohibits the use of artificial contraception” before rolling our eyes and pushing our baby stroller away–if the Lord says something is wrong, there are good reasons, and we need to be able to articulate those reasons.  No writing people off.  No running the other direction.  We need to engage.

Because I remember when I stopped using the pill.  I was terrified.  What are we supposed to DO? I wondered.  I felt trapped.  And anxious.  The pill is what young married couples used when they were newlyweds and one of them hadn’t graduated from college yet and THEY MUST NOT HAVE A BABY.

Maybe if you’ve never used contraception that sounds silly to you, but that is how I felt, and how a lot of women feel.  Because we’re told a lot of stuff by the culture.  Babies changed things.  Babies were inconvenient.  Babies could not be properly loved if you had not been married a minimum of three or four or five years.

But do you know what?  We had one of those babies.  And yeah she changed things.  And she did indeed arrive before I’d finished school.  And she was born when we’d only been married a year and a half.

And yet we’re still here!  The world did not end!  Our marriage did not implode!  It’s true that I don’t have a fancy degree hanging on my wall–nope, not even one–but I have my beautiful daughter, and seven other children now too.  And a happy marriage.  Worth it.  All the way.  My daughter being born when she was remains one of the greatest gifts God has given us.

So on this fifty-fourth birthday of the pill, I just wanted to drop in and say that I used to think I needed it even though I didn’t, and that I hope more and more women will stand up and make their voices heard.  And that more women using the pill will stop a moment and ask themselves, why?  And, what are the real results from this decades-long social experiment?

Frankly, women deserve better.

Catching up

downtownbdaySorry-not-sorry for the lack of bloggage these past couple of weeks!

I’d say the reason for my absence is that I’ve been vacationing in France, too busy staring at the Eiffel Tower to be bothered with the business of writing, but of course the truth is not nearly so exciting as that.

Really I’ve just been living Nothing too unusual.  Nothing too grand.  Just my life.  Just stuff like registering my kids for swim lessons, taking them to and from said swim lessons, hanging out at the park with friends, researching youth soccer clubs, acting as lifeguard in our backyard pool, finally getting up the motivation to mop my kitchen floor, buying margarita makings at the grocery store, looking at school stuff for the fall, going downtown for dinner to celebrate a friend’s birthday, laughing hysterically through “Parks and Recreation” every night before bed with the husband and a bowl of ice cream, and shopping at IKEA in spite of a tornado warning.

So I’d say nothing is new, but that’s not entirely true either.  Some fun changes are in store for us this upcoming school year, I’m flying to Austin next month for an event where I will know very few people, therefore triggering all manner of anxiety in my introverted heart, and I still have to tell you all about how we moved across town a few months ago after only being in our other home for 51 weeks.  I also have big plans to complain about the thankless and fruitless efforts I’ve made of late to do freelance work, and about how I keep reminding myself that Michael Jordan got cut from his high school basketball team–actually this is probably some sort of indicator as to why the freelancing isn’t panning out, my lame use of sports analogies for inspiration WHEN I HATE SPORTS.

Basically I’m woefully behind on all this mommy blogger newsy stuff, and hopefully I can get into a good summer routine to get you all caught up.  (I’m admittedly not motivated to sit inside at my laptop when the weather is so beautiful!  Also?  I hate the term mommy blogger.  Yet another topic to explore when I find the time and motivation.)

Anyhow, I hope you’re having a fabulous summer, that you don’t have a kid with a poopy diaper incident in front of all the other moms at the rec center NOT THAT THAT HAPPENED TO ME THIS WEEK, and we’ll talk soon.

P.S.  Did you know that you can subscribe to my blog, receive fabulous and important new posts like this one in your inbox, and like my page on Facebook?  You can!  Super easy.  Check out the ol’ sidebar.  And, you’re welcome.


The body shaming of Lindsey Stocker

stocker4Yesterday I saw this article about a Canadian high school junior–whose shorts allegedly violated the school dress code.  She apparently first got in trouble for wearing them, and then got in trouble for arguing with the administrators about it, and now she’s really upset about it because BODY SHAMINGIt was a hot day…I’m in trouble for showing my legs, and that’s a problem…why do they only target girls with these rules.  All sincere and heartfelt objections Lindsey makes in the video interview.

Now obviously this particular news story has little-to-nothing to do with me because a) our kids are homeschooled and thereby have to abide by MY rules–muahahahaha, and b) this happened in Canada, and I’ve never even been to Canada.  But it caught my attention anyway because it falls under the broader category of “women’s issues”, and some of the underlying stuff that Miss Stocker expresses here is hugely relevant.

First, a couple of disclaimers. 

1.)  Lindsey is a pretty girl.  And I think that is fabulous. 

2.)  She wants to be an empowered woman, is convinced the dress code rules are unjust, and is trying to take a stand for what she believes.  Seems completely age-appropriate for a teenager. 

3.)  I really don’t think she was intentionally dressing to look scandalous or provoke a scene.  I think it was, like she said, a hot day.  So she wore a pair of what were likely trendy, short shorts–just about the only type of shorts available for teens to buy at most stores in the grand year of 2014.  This I know because I recently went shopping for shorts, and the only ones I saw covered less than a string bikini.  Thankfully I’m 32 and know better.

4.)  Lindsey is absolutely correct when she says men should not feel entitled to women’s bodies.  And even if the shorts in question were a problem, Lindsey is giving voice to the fact that women are not sexual objects to be used by men.  She’s only in 11th grade.  So I say good for her. 

5.)  It’s possible that Lindsey’s just wanting to argue and complain and file some sort of lawsuit, but for the sake of argument I’m going to assume that she genuinely believes what she’s saying.

Now.  When I was in school (you know you’re getting old when you begin sentences with “when I was ____”), and public school at that, there was ALWAYS a dress code.  And it ALWAYS included shorts being at or past the fingertips.  And kids were ALWAYS expected to comply. It was just part of being a kid.  At school.  Where there were expectations for behavior, attendance, performance, and yes, appearance.  I’m sure it felt like a drag sometimes–every rule seems arbitrary when you’re young–but you know?  It was really NBD.  Of all the objectionable aspects of school, from snobby mean girls to failed geometry tests (oh how I hated geometry!), shorts-length was the least of them.     

I guess the question is, is it automatically “body shaming” to enact and enforce a dress code?  Is it anti-woman to restrict clothing options that typically only women wear?  While it certainly can be (there is NEVER a need to humiliate a girl for wearing something that’s against the rules, and it’s very possible that’s what happened here, and if so then Lindsey ought to be upset), I would say overall that no, it is most definitely NOT.

See my biggest problem with the whole body shaming claim?  It presumes that any attempt to cover parts of the female body or dictate what is appropriate for a woman to wear in a public setting (school, church, workplace) is equivalent to saying that bodies are bad.  When, really, it is actually quite the opposite:  I should care about how I present myself because God made ME, and my body is GOOD, and at the same time I am more than just my body.  I am a person.

And this is, ironically, something Lindsey sees–even if she doesn’t realize or acknowledge it.  It’s what she means when she tells the reporters that women aren’t sexual objects and what she implies when she argues that the rules specifically target women.  She knows she is more than her body.  She understands she is so much more than how much skin she’s showing on a hot spring day.  She refuses to buy into the notion that her identity is somehow rooted in her relation to the boys in her class.  And I hope she maintains, refines, and further develops these ideas in the coming years.  It could save her the heartache and trouble that come from caring too much about what random boys think.

Truth be told I might really kind of like Lindsey, but I think her approach and reasoning are misguided.  I think she should abide by the dress code.  I think she should not have argued with the powers-that-be when they attempted to enforce said dress code.  I think she should not be taking her activism cues from Tumblr.  I think she needs to stop seeing men as the enemy, although for all I know she has good reasons for that.  And, ultimately, I think she needs to take some time to think through what she is saying, because it is wildly inconsistent.

If we don’t want to appear like we want to be seen as mere sex objects, we shouldn’t wear clothing that says otherwise.  If we don’t want to appear like we want men reducing us to how we look or what we can do for them, we shouldn’t wear clothing that says otherwise.  Just like if we don’t want people to think we love Barney the purple dinosaur (ugh, remember him?), we shouldn’t wear a t-shirt with his picture plastered all over it.

And this isn’t some unjust way of letting men off the hook because this stuff actually has nothing to do with men–even if there wasn’t a man left on the planet Earth because they’d all been raptured away by Kirk Cameron, our clothing choices would still send messages about how we see ourselves and our sexuality.

So it’s important for me, as a woman, to consider whether or not what I wear reflects the dignity of personhood, according to context.  It would be inappropriate for me to wear my faded jeans and ripped sweatshirt I’ve had since college to a wedding.  I should probably not leave my house in a pair of shorts where my posterior is showing.  (Shudder.)  I wouldn’t wear a bathing suit top to a church service (oh wait–actually I did that!  But it was an accident!  Promise!)  Therefore I should also refrain from wearing anything that somehow demeans or reduces who I am as a woman.

And it’s not that I’m ashamed or repressed or hung up on modesty to the degree of obsession.  Because really, I’m not.  I love to shop.  I love fun clothes.  I love women.  I wear pants.  I don’t concern myself too much with judging what other people are wearing–we live in a modern secularized culture where people be showing some skin, and I have no desire to start writing everyone off because they happen to have a different standard than me.

The virtue of chastity is defined by the Catechism of the Catholic Church as “the successful integration of sexuality within the person and thus the inner unity of man in his bodily and spiritual being.”  It’s not something we talk much about and, frankly, when we do?  It is too often reduced to a set of rules and regulations couched in the word “modesty.”  No bikinis, no cleavage, no short shorts.  But chastity MAKES SENSE when seen as part of a beautifully holistic understanding of what it means to be human, and what it means to love.  Teenagers in particular though struggle to feel accepted and worthy of love, so why would they be interested in pursuing a chastity divorced from the Gospel and a greater understanding of  true charity?

We simply have not told them the truth.

Saint Pope John Paul II said that “Chastity is a difficult, long term matter; one must wait patiently for it to bear fruit, for the happiness of loving kindness which it must bring. But at the same time, chastity is the sure way to happiness.”

That right there is the crux of the issue, the thing that we must tell our sons and daughters over and over again: chastity is hard.  Temperance takes work.  Faith necessitates patience and long-suffering and dying to self. But it makes for a happy life, happy marriage, and happy sense of self.

If Lindsey wanted my input, I would tell her that as hard as it might be to see the connection between the length of her shorts and her dignity as a woman, it is real. I would tell her that I totally get though how she might not be able to see that right now, because she’s in high school.  And single.  And pretty.  And figuring life out. I would say that the rules make even less sense if you’ve never been told the whole story of God’s love for the world and the beauty of being created by God, as a woman.  And that she is loved desperately by this God, who cares about her heart and her mind and her dignity, and who will never leave or abandon her.

I would be kind.  And sweet.  And we would laugh together at the seeming absurdity of being suspended for wearing short shorts.  Because even though I think the school was within its rights to take action, it’s still funny.  Sorry school.

I would demand that she read Love and Responsibility when she’s old enough to not be bored by it, to in the meantime check out the Bible (universal appeal, people!), anything by CS Lewis, any of Saint Pope John Paul II’s letters/encyclicals/addresses, and Mother Teresa’s Come Be My Light, and to come have coffee with me sometime so we can discuss the aforementioned books.  (Though come to think of it, that would require a passport.  Details.  Also?  I realize I’m a book nerd.  And I have a general aversion/bias against contemporary, modern, light-reading books.  Sorry.)

And I will continue to hope and pray that my own daughters will feel, know, and most importantly believe with all that is in them that they too are loved by God, and that their dignity and value as women–as human persons–are worth protecting and nurturing.

For the sake of love.

May young women like Lindsey Stocker everywhere see that there is nothing remotely shaming about that!

The help

011Last Friday morning, whilst drinking my coffee and ignoring my kids (is there anything better than that delightful morning cuppa, best sipped in my pajamas while browsing on my laptop?), I came across a fascinating little article by Erin Zammett Ruddy, aptly titled “The ‘Nice’ Mom Gesture That Kind of Irks Me.”  OBVIOUSLY I had to read it because, you know, I’m a mom.  And I have probably irked a lot of people.  And sometimes I get irked.

Anyway, Ms. Ruddy tells the engaging story about having The World’s Worst Morning, recounting the catastrophic series of ohmygoshI’vesobeenthere events to another mom in the drop-off lane, and having that mom offer to help.  And it irked the author because the “nice mom” had more kids than her, and looked like she had it all together, so it was like she was rubbing the whole thing in her face.

And people?  I seriously loved this piece!

Not only was it witty and crazy relatable (I know I’ve had those mornings more times than I can count!), but it was refreshingly REAL.  I’ve been on both sides of that fence so it resonated with me.  In a huge way.

Those times where you just want to complain, and someone immediately tries to “fix” it with something that really doesn’t fix it.  Those times where I’ve offered help, and had a fellow mom act all exasperated and flustered because YOU HAVE EIGHT KIDS! and I’M NOT GOING TO LET YOU HELP ME!  Those times where I feel like I’m walking on eggshells and I’m afraid to say life is good or my kids are getting along swimmingly or I am able to help out because it might make the other mom, who most likely has fewer children than me, feel bad.  Like Erin felt bad.  Gah.

Basically, this article somehow managed to capture All of the Feels I have when it comes to the problem of navigating mommy friendships.  Which can be crazy complicated, and if you don’t think it is then I don’t think you’re really out there with your puke-stained diaper bag doing it.  There is all of this, for lack of a better word, posturing, and everybody has their own insecurities and baggage and assumptions–lots and lots of Big Mommy Assumptions–that they bring to the playground table.

And frankly, I feel like I’ve had a front-row seat to this phenomenon ever since we adopted my sons, and went from being an inconspicuous family of three to Those People With All of the Kids.  Pretty much overnight.  Because once our airplane touched down, we suddenly became other.  Different.  Strange.  It naturally affected how I was perceived by other moms, and sometimes I worried people thought that I thought that I was better than them.  (Did you follow that?  Because I barely did.)  And as much as I tried to assure everyone that I really am just a regular mom with regular mom capabilities and regular mom failings, I don’t know, things always had the potential to be strained from that point on.  Not with my close friends, but with new people I’d meet or with moms who didn’t know me very well.  It still happens.  And it is admittedly hard.

Also?  I recognize that this is way more self-disclosure than anyone wants to see.  Awkward.  Sorry.  I told you the article stirred up All of the Feels!

It’s a tricky thing because on the one hand, mothers-to-many shouldn’t have to perpetually keep silent or withhold help simply on account of having a higher number of children than somebody else.  But on the other, gosh, who wants to irk fellow moms?

So I guess I’ve learned to be a bit guarded about offering my assistance, and I try to empathize before doing anything else.  And trust me, sometimes empathy is enough.  Because geez, we’ve all been there.  We’ve all had a kid make a sobbing-worthy mess of the kitchen or do something super bad or humiliate us in public when they pointed at a lady and cried, “She looks like a WITCH!”  Not that my kid’s ever done that.  Cough.

But also, because my crazy brood inhibits me from helping out in some ways (I’m honestly horrible at bringing meals to people, and PUHHHHLEASE don’t ask me to prepare any sort of craft activity because it WILL trigger a downward spiral into shame, anxiety, and general self-loathing), if there’s something I can manage to do?  Sign me up.  One of my favorites is when a close friend of mine brings her kids by while she runs an errand, because not only do I love, love, love her kids but I love getting to help!

And here’s the thing that moms-of-fewer-kids need to know about moms-of-more-kids: some things are easier with more kids!  Not all things, trust me, but some.  When Ms. Ruddy ends her piece with the question what would this woman have done if I said, “Actually, yes, here’s my baby, can you take her off my plate for a few hours so I can go to spin class and then post my blog?”, she doesn’t seem to realize that the “nice” mom, if she’s anything like me, would have actually been HAPPY to do that.  Not to sound trite, but what’s one more little one when you already have several you’re caring for?  My kids ADORE babies, and anytime we’ve hosted one, it is like the best.day.ever.  “We got to play with baby ____ today!!!!” they exclaim to Daddy when he comes home, as they proceed to recount every last detail of what the baby ate and how many diapers we changed and most importantly how many times the baby smiled.

See it’s all part of living in community with people.  The fact that one mother could use some help does NOT mean that the other mother in a position to help her is somehow more capable or put together.  It just means that on that particular day, she has something to offer.  Tomorrow it will probably be her that needs help.  See how that works?  And honestly, mothers of larger families are particularly well-suited to certain things simply because we’re used to the crazy–NOT because we’re doing this thing better than anyone else or because it ISN’T crazy.  It’s just that it doesn’t phase us as much.  We are well-aware of, and hopefully becoming more comfortable with, the sad reality that control is merely an illusion. 

We know our kids will survive eating boxed mac and cheese two days in a row, and that our four-year-old isn’t going to die if she paws through the brand new bulk-sized bag of trail mix, painstakingly removes all of the M&Ms, sticks them in a Ziploc baggie, and eats them all in the same afternoonWe know.   Because when five of your kids are screaming at once and there’s poop on the floor/wall/bed and you’re nine months pregnant, well, it is what it is.  You kind of give up at that point.  Cest la vie and stuff.

So while I totally feel the author’s rage because she was ultimately wanting to vent about being a mom, and that other lady made her feel bad, and a simple “Oh man that’s awful, kids are such rotten little tyrants sometimes!” would have been better, I also think that, you know? You can’t fault a woman too much for sincerely offering her help.  Mothers of large families are not on a mission to judge or shame you (ain’t got time for that!), nor do they believe they are superior beings specially created for motherhood.  They’re in the trenches just like everyone else, experience mommy guilt just like everyone else, and occasionally even envy you with your two potty-trained kids in stain-free clothes sitting quietly with you at the hipster coffee shop. 

Shhh.  Don’t tell anyone I told you.

ALL moms, regardless the number of children we have, are out there doing our Most Very Best to get by.  Some days, survival is all we can manage–and barely, at that.  Other times we’re all “Hey, I got this!”, and we believe we can pretty much conquer the world (or at the very least, the rapidly procreating mountains of laundry threatening to take over our homes).  It’s all part of the lived experience of motherhood, and the best thing we can do for ourselves and for each other is to leave our insecurities and assumptions at the door with our kids’ muddy shoes, and simply be kind.  And accepting.  And welcoming.  TO ALL THE OTHER MOMS.  Doesn’t matter how many kids or what religion or if she’s married or whether she breastfeeds.  Does.not.ma.tter.

Because she’s a mom, and so are you, and it’s pretty much the hardest and craziest but most amazing thing in the world, and we need each other.

And so if you see me cruising around in my big van (check for me at Sonic if it’s between 2 and 4 o’clock because HAPPY HOUR) and want to complain or cry or shout, I’m all ears.  I’ll sit and listen and even buy you a Vanilla Coke and I promise I won’t judge.  Then if you want me to watch your kids for a few hours and you’re cool with them having PB&J sandwiches for lunch/dinner/allofheabove, shoot, bring them on by–but we won’t be doing arts and crafts, because I prefer for my kids to play in the dirt and occupy themselves while I drink coffee and read blogs. 

I’m a mom to eight, and that’s how I can help, and hopefully that’s okay.

The gift of evangelicalism










Let’s go back in time, shall we?

Because while it’s true that I attend Mass and own untold numbers of Marian statues now (love me some religious statues!), it wasn’t always so.  Once upon a time I was a little girl, with a little faith, in a little non-denominational community church. Like so many conservative evangelicals in my generation, I spent my formative years committing Bible verses to memory and singing “The B-I-B-L-E” and “I’m No Kin to the Monkey” at the top of my lungs. 

Yes, the latter is really a song.  Yes, it included shouting “BOOM, BOOM, BOOM!!!!” while pumping your fist in the air.  Now you know.  And, you’re welcome.

All kidding aside, I love looking back and remembering these times of yore.  Really, I do.  Because those were the days when Old and New Testament heroes came alive through flannelgraph, and we got to bring home a miniature “wordless book”, and eat two cookies each after Good News Club–and if we knew nothing else, we knew that Jesus loved us and died on the cross for our sins.  That was always the main thing.  And even as a child, I figured it was a good thing.











Then eventually Sunday School gave way to youth group with its crazy games and summer camps, and we’d meet in this old, un-air-conditioned trailer with bright fuschia carpet, and actually think it was kind of cool.  Because youth group.  (Also because we were country kids, and apparently not put off by hanging out in a broken-down rusty trailer in the weeds.  Don’t judge.  We were awesome.)

Funny thing is though that in spite of all the nostalgic happy memories (and embarrassing photos) I have, it’s becoming increasingly common for millennials to regret, repent of, and finally renounce those years of VBS and sword drills, for which Amy Grant cassette tapes served as a soundtrack.  (This was pre-Vince Gill, people!)  For whatever reason–lots of reasons, probably–the Bible verses and Sunday School Charlie stories, and even the cross, stopped being relevant, so people moved on.  Some left easily, while others continue to wrestle.  Many are finding homes in more progressive and/or mainline denominations.  A small minority now even practice the unthinkable: Catholicism.  Like me.

It seems that when my generation came of age, and we had to really own our faith, most of us didn’t want it anymore.

This is, I think, sad.  And in spite of my becoming Catholic two and a half years ago and no longer identifying as an evangelical, I do not consider myself a “recovering evangelical” or even remotely anti-evangelical.  It was part of my journey.  It was good.  I guess you could say I see my evangelical upbringing–monkey song and all–as a supreme gift

Is that surprising, coming from an ex-evangelical-turned-Catholic woman hailing from the millennial generation?  Maybe.  I don’t know.  I do know that the collective years my peers and I spent in Sunday School are commonly dismissed now as childish folly at best, and terribly destructive at worst, and yet my own experience tells a vastly different story.











The truth is that although I am happily Catholic now, I encountered Jesus in conservative evangelicalism in a profoundly beautiful and important way.  My reading and memorizing of Scripture as a child was not in vain.  The call to purity I’d hear about in my early teen years helped prepare me for life and for marriage.  The Christ and His cross preached every week to a bunch of cowboys in my small hometown are as relevant now as ever, and the love for Jesus cultivated in my heart there is what finally drove me into the fullness of the faith.

Sometimes I wonder if that is the missing piece for so many.  Perhaps when love doesn’t take root, all of the trappings of religion (be it evangelicalism or something else) quickly become tired, cumbersome, and ultimately irrelevant.  I don’t know.  I can only speak for myself when I say that all of the Bible study and Jesus talk and songs sung from the worn brown hymnals, and the way everyone would clap for you when they announced your birthday and gave you a pencil (not sure how that started but apparently this funny little tradition continues today), and how we looked forward to potlucks and youth group parties with soda and games played in the dark, and how sometimes people rode their horses to church, all of it made me fall madly in love with Jesus.  And His children.  And now, His Church.

Believe me too though when I say that I can also sympathize with my fellow-millennials, when they speak in hushed (or not-so-hushed!) tones of evangelicalism’s deficits.  It is not the whole story of faith, and its lack of historical rootedness and ever-shifting moral positions are inherently problematic for anyone who sits down and thinks very long about it.  Then there is the issue of authority, what I believe ultimately sounds the death knell for evangelicalism, and what is troubling an entire generation of Christians–driving people like my husband and me into the arms of the pope.  Because the Catholic Church is the church Jesus founded.  We have the Eucharist.  And Apostolic Succession.  And evangelicals obviously don’t.  So I get it.  I do.











But as en vogue as it all is today to lament the horrors of growing up in the conservative evangelical milieu, I’ll never be able to fully join in with the naysayers–because more than anything I am grateful to the church of my youth.  It was there where I was gifted with a love for Holy Scripture, a passion for truth, and an awareness of my need for the person of Christ.  And even when I said goodbye to my community and left for college, admittedly awash in questions about whether my childhood faith was actually relevant (or even true for that matter), do you know what I discovered?  All of that antiquated Sunday School stuff about God creating the world and Jesus dying for me was unbelievably important.  And REAL.  And the Jesus I’d sung about at camp and studied in my Zondervan Student Bible would continue to transform my life.

He would lead my husband and I to discern marriage.  He would comfort us when we lost a baby–twice.  He would take us to Africa to adopt waiting children and bring us to the historical Christian understanding of sexuality in marriage.  He would tug us, initially kicking and screaming, into the Catholic Church.

Because He is real, present, and always working.

He is love.










And that is what I saw, experienced, and now recognize as the beautiful gift I received from evangelicalism, given me by my parents and the little country church with the white steeple and ugly trailer.  I met Christ there, and speaking as a formerly-evangelical-but-now-Catholic woman, wife, and mother to eight, I could not be more grateful. 

Being a mom



“I just really want to say I admire you.  Your kids are so good, and you have the patience of a saint.  I’m about to rip my hair out with only two.”

I’d already seen the mom and her sweet, curly-haired toddlers an aisle over.  She was wearing a pretty skirt and putting some overpriced, organic, healthy, gluten-free, muffin-something-or-others in her cart, and I knew that because I’d heard her ask her kids if they wanted to get them in a really kind, enthusiastic voice.

And I’d thought, What a nice mommy!  Her kids are really blessed.  I won’t even let us stop for samples today, because I’m in such a hurry to get out of here and also to avoid any further questions or comments about my kids and my life.  Hashtag anxious introvert problems. 

So it was funny when she approached me by the cheese with words of kindness and encouragement, because I’d actually been admiring her family mere moments earlier, and I was so taken aback by what she said that I just kind of stood there like a deer in the headlights.  I told her I wanted to rip my hair out on a regular basis too, and mumbled some awkward words of thanks, and then had to get back to my four-year-old who was dancing through, and therefore obstructing, the aisle.  The encounter ended and I heaved a box of oatmeal into our cart.  Because cheap and healthy breakfast, when you have eight kids.

We didn’t cross paths again.

But I’ve been thinking about her ever since, about the fact that the lady in the sweet skirt with the fancy organic muffins went out of her way to say something to the distracted mom to eight, and I wish I didn’t get so nervous and that I’d responded differently.  I always used to see myself as someone who thinks really well on her feet.  But in a lot of ways I really don’t.

And part of the reason why is that I am just plain really uncomfortable with people thinking that what I do is so very impressive, or so different from what they do.  Because I know first-hand that it is generally NOT.  Yes I have to double most recipes and regularly run my dishwasher more than once a day, and no we don’t eat out very often because of the cost, but really?  I’m just a mom.  I yell at my kids and get mad and have bad days and second-guess what I’m doing and feel guilty and wonder if I’m doing a good or even decent job at this Very Important Thing.  Sometimes I see other women out with their kids and think they must be the fabulous ones.  Especially when they’re buying gluten free and organic treats.

So yeah, I feel terribly uncomfortable when a fellow mom is gushing about me and my family.  It feels wrong and unnecessary, and it’s embarrassing.  But yesterday, for possibly the first time ever, I gave some real thought to why she wanted to talk to me–I think because this was a lady who had adorable kids,  a cute outfit, and trendy food in her cart, yet who seemed so sincere in what she said.  Her words weren’t coming from a place of defensiveness or judgment.  She was just really nice.  And when she said she wanted to pull her hair out, she wasn’t being cliché or trite.

She was talking about being a mom.

And so it hit me–I wonder if that is what is really happening at the store, in the parking lot, and during trips to the park?  All along I’ve wondered what compels a person to confront a stranger about her family, but now I suspect that maybe it simply amounts to women wanting to talk about Being a Mom.  Maybe we feel like the culture doesn’t see us.  Maybe we wonder if what are feeling and experiencing is normal.  Maybe we see a lady with eight kids and figure heck, that’s a safe person to talk to about Being a Mom.

Were I to do yesterday’s grocery run over again–and I’m glad I don’t have to because quite frankly, I detest shopping for groceries–I probably would have still deflected her compliments (this is still me we’re talking about!) but I would have added that being a mother is really hard work, even as it is a beautiful gift.  I would have said that I really like to laugh, and that the laughter helps.  I would have said that I’ve noticed that things get easier as the kids get older, and how as hard as it might be to have multiple little ones, that sibling relationships are the best.  I would have told her that her children were precious and that irony of ironies, I’d just been thinking that she was doing an amazing job over by the muffins.  I would have lowered my voice and shared how Jesus and His mother Mary are such a source of strength for me, and how I’m really trying to focus on experiencing God’s peace these days.  I would have said how blessed I am to know so many amazing moms that encourage me, and I would have offered her my phone number or Facebook information just in case she was ever interested in meeting up.

I would have told her how, as crazy as it can be shopping with eight kids in tow, the upside is that they have a great time, and I get to emerge from the store feeling as victorious as if I’d just fought–and won–a war.

And it’s kind of true.  We mothers are fighting and winning battles, both big and small, every.single.day.  So let’s be kind out there, and take the time to connect with and encourage one another.  Next time I’m at the store, when I think something nice about another mom, comfort zone be darned I’m going to tell her so!  Because whether we have two kids or eight, whether we’re buying bulk oatmeal or muffins hand-crafted by fairies, we’re both women doing the hard, important work of love.  And if that doesn’t give us something to bond over next to the nitrate-laden lunchmeat, I don’t know what does.

Official Disclaimer: My kids are not perfect and I am not patient.  Hang around us long enough, and you’ll see for yourself!

Sex Without the Babies

I don’t know how many of you watch those Upworthy videos that seem to be everywhere these days.  Mostly I cough, chuckle, or roll my eyes and pass them on by because 1) they’re pumping out an insane number of these things and who has the time, and 2) I find the vast majority to be most definitely UN-upworthy–clearly I’m not their target audience.  We’re not on the same page.  I am not worthy of Upworthy.  So I ignore them.

But I’m sorry, even against my better judgment I had to watch this one.  If you haven’t seen it, some guy cooks food and talks about how hormonal birth control works and encourages women to go on the pill, and it all kind of culminates with the pithy phrase SEX WITHOUT THE BABIES showing up on the screen at the end.

At least he’s being honest.

Now I’m not so much troubled by the fact that some random guy with a webcam who goes by the name of “Bedsider” thinks this way–isn’t that what everyone wants these days, sex without the babies?–but I AM highly disturbed that plenty of people (including the folks at Upworthy and, you know, Bill and Melinda Gates) think it’s pro-woman and pro-feminist and pro-sexual-freedom to promote this stuff.  Think about it–this is a guy apparently so committed to using (and then discarding) women for his own personal gain that he wants them all on synthetic hormones, hormones that carry great potential for unpleasant side effects.  Not the least of which is, um, stroke.  It’s worth it to him, though, because then he can have all the fun he wants without any of the consequences.  Because SEX WITHOUT THE BABIES.  Because he can be with a woman, without having to truly be with a woman.  Score.

And people are applauding this!  Instead of asking hard questions like “What happens if/when the pill fails and our friend Bedsider DOES become a father?”, or “Is something wrong with a culture that prizes unattached and recreational sex so much that it is willing to destroy women’s health in its pursuit?”, everyone is all OHTHISISSOGREAT! and UPWORTHYISTHEBEST!

When are we going to stop victimizing and shaming women for having female bodies?  When will enough be enough?  It’s funny–as in knee-slapping, fall-out-of-your-chair, snorting-Dr.-Pepper-out-your-nose funny–because Upworthy has the video categorized under and tagged as both “gender” and “health”.

Teeheehee.  Hohoho.  Bwahahaha.

Do you get the irony?  It sure seems to me like we’re trying to rob and deny women of their gender by dumping carcinogenic chemicals into their bodies that suppress natural female processes.  And seriously, health?!  There is nothing remotely healthy about the birth control pill.  It is actually quite the OPPOSITE of healthy.  For women and for babies.  Forever and ever.  The end.

Frankly I’m both baffled and offended by Bedsider’s belief that anyone with two X-chromosomes ought to get a prescription for the pill so he can have his beloved SEX WITHOUT THE BABIES.  “Your lady needs to take the pill…every.single.day.”  There is no freedom for women in that, no dignity or beauty in altering our physical makeup and putting our health at risk so as to always be at the ready for some good old-fashioned fun–with someone ill-prepared to take any sort of responsibility for the relationship.  Webcam-gone-viral or not, it’s time for this guy to grow up.

Of course men like him aren’t the only (or even primary) problem.  At all.

We women need, from a place of strength and autonomy, to stand up and say NO to the pill.

People identifying as pro-life Christians need to start having an honest conversation about this because the pill is an abortifacient, and yet its use remains common in these circles.  IT IS NOT PRO-LIFE TO USE AN ABORTIFACIENT.  You should not be taking it.  End of story.

Parents need to tell their children the truth about sexuality, motherhood and fatherhood, gender, and marriage–in age-appropriate ways–as their children grow.  Then and only then will we have a society of adults prepared to do the long, hard work of raising families and thus building healthy communities.

Is this stuff inherently uncomfortable to talk about?  Maybe.  Probably.  Okay, most definitely, and anytime I write about how women deserve better choices I hear from angry ladies identifying as feminists but who apparently don’t understand what that word ought to mean.  And that’s understandable, because for decades now the birth control pill has been marketed to women as a more or less essential, common-sense method of regulating fertility and achieving ultimate sexual freedom, and so to question its hallowed place in society is tantamount to puppy torture, or worse.  But I would argue that exposing the truth about the pill is necessary so that women will know.

That there is life after the pill.

That there is life after motherhood.

That womanhood in its fullness ought to be respected, not suppressed.

That SEX WITHOUT THE BABIES is a myth.  Any abortion provider could tell you that where there is sex, even “safe” sex, there will be babies.

That Upworthy, Bill, Melinda, Bedsider, and your best friend aren’t telling you the whole story when they advocate the birth control pill as a reliable, healthy, positive choice for women.

So you know what, Upworthy?  If that pathetically misogynistic video is what you consider upworthy, well, I have only been confirmed in my general feelings of ambivalence for your multiplying-like-rabbits-in-my-Facebook-feed videos.

Because I’m a woman, and I’m over the whole women being shamed for being women thing.  I’m a woman, and I’m over the expectation that there is something so wrong with women that it apparently necessitates putting all of us on a daily, dangerous hormone regimen.  I’m a woman, and I’m over women being used only or primarily as sexual partners, as if our sexuality can somehow be separated out from the rest of who we are.


And you should be too.

Because SEX WITHOUT THE BABIES is overhyped, love and beauty are far better, and the dignity of the human person–the whole human person–are worth fighting for.